ANONYMOUS has organized a national event called #FLOODTHESTREETS to demand Justice for John Crawford, who was executed by police in Beaver Creek, Ohio. The blatant excess in this case was captured on store cameras.

This event is happening February 1 at 11am nationwide. A promotional bundle with various print and web outputs can be downloaded through the following link:

*promo-bundle: click to download*

In The Twin Cities, this event will be held at the Midway Wal-Mart. The Address is 1450 University Avenue, Saint Paul, MN. There is also a Facebook event page.

*click here visit the Facebook event page*

Can't get to the location? No problem. Get people together and be seen at your local neighborhood WalMart. The message should go out everywhere.

ifoughtthelaw.info has been asked to be a platform for this event, providing details and updates. As such, from now until February 1, there will be no new articles posted unless they contain updates or other information relevant to the event. Of course, past articles are still available on this site, feel free to read them and learn a thing or two about the subject of police brutality.

John Crawford was shot dead in a WalMart in Beaver Creek, Ohio after picking up a pellet gun which he intended to buy. He was then shot dead by police while talking on the phone after a customer called 911 claiming John Crawford was pointing a gun at people. The man has since recanted, saying that "at no time did John Crawford shoulder or point the gun at anyone". When police showed up, they shot John Crawford dead with no warning, according to witnesses and in-store video. A detailed video with the 911 audio shows that Crawford was indeed not behaving in a threatening manner at all. A second person, Angela Williams, died of a heart attack caused by the shooting.

Some cases are harder for us to argue than others. Many aren't. This one is definitely in the latter category. The man was carrying an unloaded toy gun that he intended to purchase, in an open-carry state. Video shows him being gunned down with no time to comply with warnings that may not have even been given, while holding the toy harmlessly at his side. Basically, the new standard is that if someone decides they don't like you and calls 911, don't expect the police to apply proper critical thought or proper procedure when they come for you. One 911 call out of ignorance or spite, and you are dead. That is scary as hell. Statistically, this is also much more likely to happen if you're black. That is disturbing as hell.

Most importantly, The officers are not being punished for an action that would have put you or I on the fast track to the death penalty. This is the heart and soul of our struggle against police brutality: the blatant lack of accountability in police culture. Most of us are not actually anti-cop. We are anti-bad cop. The protests will continue until said bad cops are disciplined.

ifoughtthelaw.info is merely providing the official platform for the Midway gathering of this event. In no way does ifoughtthelaw.info claim credit for any of the organizing. NOBODY owns this event, except Anonymous-and Anonymous has no sponsors. Be very wary of any group, business, or person putting their own agenda front and center at this event.

Masks-particularly Guy Fawkes masks-are encouraged, but in no way necessary. Local party supply and costume stores are being notified to stock up on masks for anyone who wishes to purchase one for this event. Assemble on the sidewalk on University Avenue in front of WalMart. There will be local Anons clearly marked in a fashion that will be communicated the morning of the event who will provide guidance and reveal the day's plan. Until then, the plan is being kept close. Things will be revealed to us at the proper time. Stay tuned to this site and @ifoughtthelaw8 on Twitter for updates as they are revealed to the admins of this site.



This worldwide release by Anonymous:

Critical thinking is a process that requires one to recognize that there are no absolutes. Obviously, America is in the shitter when it comes to using its brain, because pretty much everything Americans have to say is either/or. So I guess I shouldn't be surprised that because I want to do something about police misconduct I am a "cop hater", or that as an anarchist, I want to cause disruption for disruption's sake. Or my favorite-I listen to metal, so therefore I must be antisocial.

I am going to clarify this again, because so many people-including friends of mine who should know better think I am a cop hater. (They could pick up the phone and talk to me about this, ask some questions-you know, use their brain. But, metal is as stupid does, I guess)

Now I admit, and most people who know my history admit, I have very good reason to hate cops. It's something I'm under a court order to not discuss, so I won't. But trust me, any logical person who knew it would wonder why I don't.

By the way, I apologize for my slow writing schedule as of late. Major orthopedic surgery has slowed my roll. I'm under incredible physical pain every day, and it's hard to write. Just saying.

And, truth be told, I did hate cops for a while. In fact, I hated cops right up until I started doing something about police misconduct. Doing what I do has helped me make peace with some bad shit I had to deal with-still have to deal with, actually. But I can assure you, I don't hate cops. I know cops. Some of them are royal dicks. Some are pretty awesome. The culture is awful, though. Machismo, corruption, and brutality. I do hate that. Some cops can resist the culture and be trusted with mace, clubs, and guns. But many can't.

And I sure hate some of the things cops do. Raiding the wrong house and shooting a seven-year-old girl in her sleep is pretty fucked up, and I'm going to call a duck a duck. The cops responsible should fry. The people who justify it should fry. (Critical thinking alert: "I know it's sad, but..." means you are not sad about shit when we're talking about a seven year old getting shot in her sleep) And anyone who lets them get away with it should fry.

Well now, that's the problem, isn't it? Nobody fries. At worst, they sit in some lukewarm water for a little while. In fact-very rare cases aside-the only option a victim of police misconduct has for getting anything resembling justice is to sue the cop, whose burden the city bears, which gets passed on to the taxpayers. (Aaaaand just like that, "conservatives" who were concerned about rising taxes and wasteful spending suddenly go silent!) That's not justice, by the way.

In an odd twist of timing, two NYC cops and one Florida cop have been executed in the last 24 hours that I started writing this. So, I guess I'll comment on that. I don't think whoever did it had any right to do it. Damn, I wish I could hear cop supporters say they don't think a New York cop had a right to choke Eric Garner to death for selling cigarettes. But therein probably lies the reason it happened-because the lives of some-specifically those with a badge-are more important than the lives of others. If a cop was breaking a trivial law and gave me attitude like Eric Garner admittedly gave a cop when I called him out on it, and I choked him to death for it like a cop choked Eric Garner to death for it, there would probably be a national day of mourning. Flags at half mast, the whole deal. And, I bet that even if there was no video proof, I would be convicted swiftly, while video evidence of a cop's wrongdoing that resulted in death couldn't even get him an indictment. And the establishment responds with body cameras. HELLO!!! Eric Garner's murder was filmed and preserved for all to see, and it made not one lick of difference!

Seriously, is this thing on?

I was not happy when I saw vigilante justice on the horizon, but I am not surprised that it arrived. I am sad as hell, though. Indeed, I had hoped the problem could be solved before it came to this. I worked hard to that end. And now, even as law enforcement will continue to refuse to take a look at itself, its practices, and its impunity that have driven some to feel as though vigilantism is the answer (hopefully no more. Please, no more), I will continue to push for reform.

I should mention: the police shooters weren't active protesters. The protesters are mostly nonviolent. In fact, Compelling video evidence exists giving reason to believe it wasn't protesters but a paramilitary force who started all those fires after the GJ decision in Ferguson (In case you're wondering why the statist media suddenly shifted its focus away from the riots),yet another reason for cops to hate cameras that are not under their control.

But, law enforcement culture resists any and all accountability. And so it remains that law enforcement is the only job I know of where you can throw a tantrum, kill or seriously injure someone needlessly, cost your employer over a million dollars in lawsuits, and keep your job. I really hate that.

"What about black-on-black crime, blah blah blah..."

Shut up. Just. Stop.

Yes. Black-on-black violent crime sucks. Hell, I'll see your ten and raise you twenty: All violent crime sucks. (FYI, intraracial crime is not unique to black people, in spite of what Sean Hannity and Bill O'Reilly might say) But do you know what happens when criminals commit needless violence? Cops hunt them down and they get prosecuted. Do you know what happens when a cop goes rogue and commits needless violence? Cops circle the wagons and protect said cop, usually at great expense to taxpayers. Do you see the problem there?

Now before trolls that lick the government boot jump up and start denying shit, or whatever: mind you-I have had to experience some really bad shit that you cannot tell me didn't happen. In fact, your trying to tell me that things I have directly experienced weren't experienced, that is one of the reasons I am the activist I am. So if you really want to do your side a favor, shut up and stop strengthening my resolve.

Look, I realize most police encounters end uneventfully. Thank God for that. But here's the thing: some do not. And then some end very unfairly. You do not ignore a fire because it's only burning in one room of your house. And that is the heart of this struggle.

I have very strong spiritual beliefs regarding hate and violence. I believe it feeds negativity, which is a parasite, and that of course weakens humanity. That same negativity loves when hate and violence produces a response of hate and violence, because it has more to feed off of. This allows it to create more negativity in us, creating more opportunities to feed, weakening us further and further. So, to that end, even though I have to process some shit, I work to put hate behind me. I've done a good job of it too.

But when I see a class of human that gets away with it when others don't, I do something about it. Because otherwise violence could beget violence, in a pattern of escalation that law enforcement culture gleefully feeds into, and now more Americans have been killed by police than the Iraq War.

Do you still think that because I want to do something about police misconduct, I hate cops?

Well then, there you go. You are part of the reason I do this.

In response to Minneapolis Police Chief Janee Harteau's cancellation of a community listening session due to vaguely asserted claims of "threats" to the chief and her officers, Communities United Against Police Brutality has called B.S. and filed a data practices request demanding all internal communications between members of the Minneapolis Police Department in regards to this matter. In addition, they are also demanding all communications between members of the city council, the mayor's office, and the city attorney's office in regard to this matter.

Typically, a government entity is expected to respond within 10 days' time. If the city of Minneapolis fails to provide the records, Communities United Against Police Brutality has legal recourse, which they are prepared to follow.

The actual Government Data Practices Act has been included with this article.

I have been skeptical from the outset, as she refused to show any clear and credible indication of threats from the outset, other than a reference to "direct action" on the Critical Change Coalition Facebook Page, which I was able to easily refute. This demand for proof is very appropriate and neccesary

We at ifoughtthelaw.info will be following this matter closely, and will report on new events as they occur.

Stay tuned.

In response to Minneapolis Police Chief Janee Harteau's dodging of the community listening session on Thursday, September 19th at The Sabathani Community Center in Minneapolis due to vague references to "threats to the the physical safety" of her and her officers, Communities United Against Police Brutality has issued a public response condemning her slander of concerned community members planning on attending the event. In their press release, they called shenanigans by stating that they have submitted a legal request for data pertaining to all communications related to the supposed threats. they have also challenged her to reschedule a session allowing the community to finally address her and have long standing questions of trust answered, since the "public safety concerns" were proven to be unfounded by the peaceful conduct of all who attended, even in spite of her brazen slap in their faces.

In an earlier article, I gave my own harsh analysis of her behavior and why I think her claims are false. I am very happy to see Communities United Against Police Brutality stepping up and throwing down the gauntlet on this one, and I look forward to what the city of Minneapolis provides in response. I am guessing will probably be excuses and stalling tactics, ultimately proving them-and all of us who are concerned about the lack of transparency and accountability-correct.

I have included the full press release in its original form below.

*UPDATE: According to Fox 9 News, Chief Harteau specifically referenced the Coalition For Critical Change, saying there was a call for "direct action" on its Facebook page. She plays the politics game very well. The "direct action" she referred to was spelled out clearly: red arm bands and signs protesting police brutality, as well as making sure it remained a discussion, and not a one-sided PR session. Which, actually, must be pretty terrifying to the Minneapolis Police Department, now that I think of it.


I try to be fair and level-headed, but sometimes you just have to call a duck a duck. Or, in this case, a chicken.

Tonight at the Sabathani Community Center; A community listening session was scheduled at which Chief Harteau was expected to attend. It is my humble oppinion that Chief Harteau's idea of a community listening session is mostly her talking and the community listening. This of course solves nothing, as police have been talking to the community and not letting the community talk to them for a long time now. At this community listening session people were actually able to speak to the panel, presenting their questions and comments. I think that once she learned that this session may involve actually answering for her department's actions, she backed chickened out.

This behavior from a public servant, whose job is to face the community her department allegedly serves, is despicable. However, it's only the beginning. The reason she gave was she had reason to believe that people attending were planning on disrupting the meeting, and said people would potentially pose a safety threat for her and her officers.

Yes-that's right. She weaseled out of a listening session, where she would have to face the very public her department routinely terrorizes, by slandering said public. Two birds, one stone. It's brilliant, but despicable.

First, let's be clear on something that Chief Harteau as the chief of police, knows very well: This community of activists has a well-established track record of safe and peaceful events. I refuse to believe that Chief Harteau, as the head of an agency we are protesting, is unaware of this.

Second, the reason we are out here doing what we do is because we have a very keen awareness of the fact that police are killing and brutalizing people in increasing numbers. We know that many in the law enforcement community are looking for reasons to brutalize and kill people. Why would we give them a reason. We know how it would end and we don't want that. I refuse to believe that Chief Harteau got her job by being too stupid to use elementary logic.

Third, the nature of what I do has me with my ear to the ground in this community. I hear about things. If something so foolish as aggressive action was actually being planned, I would have heard about it and I would have been heard speaking out against it, because I-like others-am of the firm belief that violence is not the answer to violence.

I do believe that people who are tired of being told to listen to their community servants when their community servants refuse to listen to them were prepared for Chief Harteau to attempt to control the conversation-and as such were prepared to disrupt the proceedings with real questions and a demand for answers. This is not a threat to anyone.

That is, unless it results in the police chief having to face the community on even ground and finally answer our questions. Questions like:

• Why do you allow cops with a clear history of brutality and aggression to remain on the street, when this costs cost the city Hundreds of thousands of dollars in lawsuits?
• Why are victims of police brutality prosecuted more harshly than those who aren't victims of police brutality?
• Why do police have military weapons when they have clearly demonstrated that they lack the restraint and professionalism of the armed forces they inherit said weapons from?
• Why do victims of police brutality have to sue to gain any sort of justice?
• Why are paramilitary raids used to execute search warrants on non-violent offenders?
• Why do patterns of racism show themselves in law enforcement, to the point of drawing criticism from the U.N.? 

Chief Harteau has illustrated one of the major facets of the problem we are addressing: Law enforcement's fear of the same accountability they claim the rest of us should be held to.

Or, as I am just going to come out and say: She's chicken.

Or maybe I have it wrong. As I read through this article again, I'm wondering if maybe she's a weasel.

Yeah...I said it.